4.6 Review

Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 95-104

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002

关键词

animal models; bone defect; bone regeneration; bone substitutes

资金

  1. NSFC-DG-RTD Joint Scheme [51361130034]
  2. European Union's [NMP3-SL-2013-604517]
  3. NSFC [51203178]
  4. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Foundation [JCYJ20120617114912864]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration, is essential. In order to evaluate biomaterials to be developed as bone substitutes for bone defect repair, it is essential to establish clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo testing models for investigating their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, degradation, and interactional with culture medium or host tissues. The results of the in vitro experiment contribute significantly to the evaluation of direct cell response to the substitute biomaterial, and the in vivo tests constitute a stepmidway between in vitro tests and human clinical trials. Therefore, it is essential to develop or adopt a suitable in vivo bone defect animal model for testing bone substitutes for defect repair. This review aimed at introducing and discussing the most available and commonly used bone defect animal models for testing specific substitute biomaterials. Additionally, we reviewed surgical protocols for establishing relevant preclinical bone defect models with various animal species and the evaluation methodologies of the bone regeneration process after the implantation of bone substitute biomaterials. This review provides an important reference for preclinical studies in translational orthopaedics. Copyright (C) 2015, The Authors. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据