4.8 Article

Identification of Prognostic Phenotypes of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in 2 Independent Cohorts

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 155, 期 6, 页码 1720-+

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.036

关键词

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; Barrett Esophagus; Survival; Esophagus

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [RG66287]
  2. CRUK
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12022/2, MR/M009157/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) present with de novo tumors. Although this could be due to inadequate screening strategies, the precise reason for this observation is not clear. We compared survival of patients with prevalent EAC with and without synchronous Barrett esophagus (BE) with intestinal metaplasia (IM) at the time of EAC diagnosis. METHODS: Clinical data were studied using Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the effect of synchronous BE-IM on EAC survival independent of age, sex, TNM stage, and tumor location. We analyzed data from a cohort of patients with EAC from the Mayo Clinic (n = 411; 203 with BE and IM) and a multicenter cohort from the United Kingdom (n = 1417; 638 with BE and IM). RESULTS: In the Mayo cohort, BE with IM had a reduced risk of death compared to patients without BE and IM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57; P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, BE with IM was associated with longer survival independent of patient age or sex, tumor stage or location, and BE length (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.5-0.88; P=.005). In the United Kingdom cohort, patients BE and IM had a reduced risk of death compared with those without (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.5-0.69; P<.001), with continued significance in multivariable analysis that included patient age and sex and tumor stage and tumor location (adjusted HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.93; P=.006). CONCLUSION: Two types of EAC can be characterized based on the presence or absence of BE. These findings could increase our understanding the etiology of EAC, and be used in management and prognosis of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据