4.1 Article

Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis in Spain: A nationwide clinical practice survey

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 90-101

出版社

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.09.002

关键词

Ciclosporin; Ulcerative colitis; Survey; Infliximab; Clinical practice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the digestive tract and up to 20-30% of UC patients may suffer a severe flare-up during the course of the disease. Although there are national and international recommendations about its clinical management, there is not enough information about the treatment of acute severe UC in clinical practice. Methods: An electronic and anonymous survey with 51 multiple-choice questions was performed among all the members of the Spanish Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Working Group (GETECCU). Results: Out of the 164 responders (20%), most were gastroenterologists (95%), with 59% from tertiary hospitals treating a median of 5 patients per year (IQR: 3-8) with a severe flare-up of ulcerative colitis. An endoscopic examination was routinely performed in 86% of patients (62% at admission). The most commonly used corticosteroid was methylprednisolone, usually at a dose of 60 mg/day, and its response was assessed after a median of 3 days (IQR: 3-5). Both in thiopurine-naive and thiopurine-refractory patients, infliximab was the drug most frequently prescribed as rescue therapy. Half of responders (55%) had ever prescribed a first dose of infliximab higher than 5 mg/kg, and a higher proportion (73%) had ever prescribed an earlier dose of infliximab in the second or third infusion. Conclusions: Acute severe UC is generally managed according to current treatment guidelines in our setting. The rescue therapy most commonly prescribed is infliximab, and the use of intensified or accelerated regimens with this biological drug is not unusual. (C) 2018 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据