4.7 Article

Aromatization of C5 hydrocarbons over Ga-modified hierarchical HZSM-5 nanosheets

期刊

FUEL
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 1243-1253

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.093

关键词

Hierarchical zeolite nanosheets; Aromatization; C5 hydrocarbons; Gallium species

资金

  1. Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology (VISTEC)
  2. PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (PTTGC)
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [MRG6180099]
  4. Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC)
  5. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand, through its program of Research Network NANOTEC (RNN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aromatization of C-5 hydrocarbons is an interesting process to convert low-cost petrochemical-based compounds to high value-added compounds, especially benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). However, the development of an appropriate catalyst for this reaction is still challenging both academic and industrial points of view. In this context, the Ga-incorporated zeolites with hierarchical nanosheet structures have been successfully prepared by various preparation methods, including an in-situ approach, an ion-exchange, and impregnation methods. Compared to the conventional catalyst, Ga-modified HZSM-5 nanosheets exhibited the significantly improved catalytic performance with n-pentane conversion and BTEX selectivity of over 40% and 45%, respectively. From the structural analysis of the roles of Ga active species in the C-5 aromatization, it is also important to mention that the enhanced catalytic activity related to an increase in the contribution degree of highly dispersed tetrahedral Ga species attached to the zeolite framework compared to bulk Ga2O3 particles in nanosheet structures, which was confirmed by both experimental and theoretical (DFT calculation) data. This work opens up new perspectives for the ZSM-5 nanosheet catalyst design in the application of the C-5 aromatization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据