4.6 Article

Benthivorous fish bioturbation reduces methane emissions, but increases total greenhouse gas emissions

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 197-207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13209

关键词

carbon dioxide; Cyprinus carpio; methane diffusion; methane ebullition; phosphorus

资金

  1. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [86312012]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [BEX 13607/13-8]
  3. TTW-Open Technology Program [14424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globally, aquatic systems face increasing challenges with respect to increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, eutrophication and strongly altered fish community composition. Although it is known that benthivorous fish can influence sediment and water column biogeochemistry, studies showing causal relationships are largely lacking. Here, we used a mesocosm approach with Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) to unravel the effects of bioturbation on GHG and nutrient dynamics. We hypothesised that fish bioturbation decreases methane (CH4) emissions and increases carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by increased sediment oxygenation. Additionally, lower phosphorus (P) mobilisation was expected due to increased binding to ferric iron (Fe3+). We found that benthivorous fish increased water turbidity, and reduced CH4 diffusion to the atmosphere by 33%, and ebullition by 67%, probably because of sediment oxygenation. Simultaneously, however, CO2 emissions increased due to higher aerobic decomposition, leading to higher overall GHG emissions. In contrast to our hypothesis, we did not find indications of bioturbation affecting P mobilisation from the sediment, probably because P binding was already high in the control treatment as a result of high porewater Fe:P ratios. We conclude that bioturbation by fish has strong effects on GHG emissions as a result of higher overall decomposition rates offsetting reduced CH4 emissions. Depending on porewater Fe:P ratios, benthivorous fish may additionally reduce P mobilisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据