4.7 Article

Shelf-life and microbial community dynamics of super-chilled beef imported from Australia to China

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 784-792

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.039

关键词

Shelf-life; Super-chilled; Beef; High-throughput sequencing; Microbial diversity

资金

  1. earmarked funds for China Agriculture Research System -beef [CARS-37]
  2. National natural science foundation of China [031601528]
  3. special fund for innovation team of modern agricultural industrial technology system in Shandong Province, China [SDAIT-09-09]
  4. Shandong Double Tops program from Shandong Agricultural University, China [SYL2O17XTTD12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the shelf-life and microbial community dynamics of super-chilled vacuum -packaged beef striploins imported from Australia to China after approximately five weeks of shipping time and an additional 15 weeks of storage at -1 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C. Data analysis using a mixed model (REML) with time as the fixed effect and portion as a random effect, showed that the only beef quality trait that changed during storage was total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN; P <.05), which reached the threshold of 15 mg/100 g between 15 and 20 weeks (including 5 weeks of transport). The total viable count (TVC) accounted for 78% of the variance in TVBN, when storage time was included in the model. Sensory scores decreased as storage time extended (P <.05), but were still acceptable at 20 weeks. After 9 weeks, Carnobacteriton spp. and Lactobacillus spp. dominated alternately and then Lactobacillus became the most prevalent bacteria. An operational taxominc unit based hierarchical cluster analysis using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means was performed and it was shown that the bacterial communities tended to be consistent as storage time extended. Overall indications are that beef which is safe can be imported into China from Australia and aged for extended periods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据