4.7 Article

First characterization of Pompia intrea candied fruit: The headspace chemical profile, polar extract composition and its biological activities

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 620-630

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.016

关键词

Candied fruit; Citrus monstruosa L.; LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS; GC-FID/MS; Caco-2 cell; Polyphenols

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [HRZZ-IP-11-2013-8547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracts obtained from Pompia intrea (PI), a traditional candied fruit whose main ingredient is the pompia fruit (Citrus monstruosa L.) were evaluated for the first time. Volatile compounds were evaluated by headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by GC-FID/MS analyses. Polar compounds were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray mass spectrometry LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS and quantified by liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet/visible detection (LC-DAD). The antioxidant activity of these extracts was tested using the FRAP, CUPRAC, ABTS(center dot+) and DPPH center dot assays. Moreover, their ability to protect intestinal cells against lipid peroxidation was studied. The HS-SPME GC-FID/MS confirmed the presence of typical molecules originating from the fruit (mainly terpenes, but particularly limonene). The LC-DAD and LC-ESI-(HR)MSn profiles showed high levels of neohesperidin (45.7 +/- 11.1 mg/L) and 5-(hydroxymethyl) furfural (40.8 +/- 23.5 mg/L). The results showed that the PI extracts contained high levels of total phenols and exhibited considerable antioxidant activity, which was significantly correlated to the presence of specific compounds such as neoeriocitrin and neohesperidin. Furthermore, pretreatments with different concentrations of PI extracts preserved enterocytes from oxidative damage by scavenging reactive oxygen species, thus counteracting lipid peroxidation. This study suggests that consumption of PI could provide intake of compounds with ascertained biological activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据