4.5 Article

Evidence for embryonic haemoglobins from Sparus aurata under normal and hypoxic conditions

期刊

FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 943-954

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-018-0605-y

关键词

Teleost; Fish culture; Haemoglobins; Embryonic globin chains; Phylogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Teleost haemoglobins vary in polymorphisms and primary structure, although display similar functional properties. Key amino acids for Root effect (a reduction in oxygen-carrying capacity and loss of cooperativity with declining pH) are conserved throughout fish evolution. For the first time, we cloned and characterised Sparus aurata L. embryonic globin chains (e alpha 1, e alpha 2, e beta). We also studied haemoglobins (eHbI, eHbII) behaviour in normal and low-oxygen conditions. Several amino acids in fry globins are different in chemical type (e.g. polar -> non-polar and vice versa), compared to adult globins. His55 alpha 1, crucial for Root effect, is substituted by Ala in fry, presumably enhancing oxygen capture, transport and reducing the dependence of Root effect from pH. Phylogenetic trees demonstrate that e alpha 1 globin diversified more recently than e alpha 2; moreover, e alpha 1, e alpha 2 and e beta globins evolved earlier than adult alpha and beta globins. In low-oxygen conditions, fry haemoglobins display the same behaviour of the adult haemoglobins (probably, embryonic and adult-type I Hbs display a higher oxygen affinity than type II Hbs, operating through a rapid cycle of heme-Fe auto-oxidation/reduction). Therefore, based on our results and on the comparison with adult haemoglobins, we hypothesise that embryonic haemoglobins have evolved to better adapt fry to variable habitats. We studied Sparus aurata for its economical relevance in Mediterranean aquaculture. The information we provide can help understand Sparus aurata behaviour in the wild and in rearing conditions. Further studies with functional assays will deepen the knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of fry haemoglobin physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据