4.7 Article

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 110, 期 5, 页码 896-904

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.021

关键词

in vitro fertilization; preitnplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; Cost effectiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost-effective for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design: Decision analytic model comparing costs and clinical outcomes of two strategies: IVF with and without POT-A. Setting: Genetics laboratory. Patients: Women <= 42 years of age undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): Decision analytic model applied to the above patient population utilizing a combination of actual clinical data and assumptions from the literature regarding the outcomes of IVF with and without POT-A. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was cumulative IVF-related costs to achieve a live birth or exhaust the embryo cohort from a single oocyte retrieval. The secondary outcomes were time from retrieval to the embryo transfer resulting in live birth or completion of treatment, cumulative live birth rate, failed embryo transfers, and clinical losses. Results: 8,998 patients from 74 IVF centers were included. For patients with greater than one embryo, the cost differential favored the use of POT-A, ranging from $931-2411 and depending upon number of embryos screened. As expected, the cumulative live birth rate was equivalent for both groups once all embryos were exhausted. However, POT-A reduced time in treatment by up to four months. In addition, patients undergoing PGT-A experienced fewer failed embryo transfers and clinical miscarriages. Conclusion: For patients with > 1 embryo, IVF with POT-A reduces healthcare costs, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage when compared to IVF alone. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据