4.6 Article

Secreted d-aspartate oxidase functions in C-elegans reproduction and development

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 286, 期 1, 页码 124-138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.14691

关键词

Caenorhabditis elegans; d-amino acid; d-aspartate oxidase; d-glutamate; secretory protein

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources
  2. Kitasato University Research Grant for Young Researchers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

d-Aspartate oxidase (DDO) is a degradative enzyme that acts stereospecifically on free acidic D-amino acids such as d-aspartate and d-glutamate. d-Aspartate plays an important role in regulating neurotransmission, developmental processes, hormone secretion, and reproductive functions in mammals. In contrast, the physiological role of d-glutamate in mammals remains unclear. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the enzyme responsible for in vivo metabolism of d-glutamate is DDO-3, one of the three DDO isoforms, which is also required for normal self-fertility, hatching, and lifespan. In general, eukaryotic DDOs localize to subcellular peroxisomes in a peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 (PTS1)-dependent manner. However, DDO-3 does not contain a PTS1, but instead has a putative N-terminal signal peptide (SP). In this study, we found that DDO-3 is a secreted DDO, the first such enzyme to be described in eukaryotes. In hermaphrodites, DDO-3 was secreted from the proximal gonadal sheath cells in a SP-dependent manner and transferred to the oocyte surface. In males, DDO-3 was secreted from the seminal vesicle into the seminal fluid in a SP-dependent manner during mating with hermaphrodites. In both sexes, DDO-3 was secreted from the cells where it was produced into the body fluid and taken up by scavenger coelomocytes. Full-length DDO-3 transgene rescued all phenotypes elicited by the deletion of ddo-3, whereas a DDO-3 transgene lacking the putative SP did not. Together, these results indicate that secretion of DDO-3 is essential for its physiological functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据