4.7 Article

Hypercapnic acidosis induces mitochondrial dysfunction and impairs the ability of mesenchymal stem cells to promote distal lung epithelial repair

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 5585-5598

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201802056R

关键词

ARDS; hypercapnic acidosis; mitochondrial transfer; wound healing

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/L017229/1]
  2. MRC Queen's University of Belfast (QUB) [CD1516-CIC4]
  3. Department for Education (DfE)
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health [P40RR017447]
  5. MRC [MR/L017229/1, MR/M009149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a devastating disorder characterized by diffuse inflammation and edema formation. The main management strategy, low tidal volume ventilation, can be associated with the development of hypercapnic acidosis (HCA). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic candidate currently in early-phase clinical trials. The effects of HCA on the alveolar epithelium and capillary endothelium are not well established. The therapeutic efficacy of MSCs has never been reported in HCA. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of HCA on inflammatory response and reparative potential of the primary human small airway epithelial and lung microvasculature endothelial cells as well as on the capacity of bone marrow-derived MSCs to promote wound healing in vitro. We demonstrate that HCA attenuates the inflammatory response and reparative potential of primary human small airway epithelium and capillary endothelium and induces mitochondrial dysfunction. It was found that MSCs promote lung epithelial wound repair via the transfer of functional mitochondria; however, this proreparative effect of MSCs was lost in the setting of HCA. Therefore, HCA may adversely impact recovery from ARDS at the cellular level, whereas MSCs may not be therapeutically beneficial in patients with ARDS who develop HCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据