4.6 Article

The expanding burden of idiopathic intracranial hypertension

期刊

EYE
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 478-485

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0238-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship [NIHR-CS-011-028]
  2. Medical Research Council, UK [MR/K015184/1]
  3. MRC [MR/K015184/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To quantify the hospital burden and health economic impact of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Methods Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) national data was extracted between 1st January 2002 and 31st December 2016. All those within England with a diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension were included. Those with secondary causes of raised intracranial pressure such as tumours, hydrocephalus and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis were excluded. Results A total of 23,182 new IIH cases were diagnosed. Fifty-two percent resided in the most socially deprived areas (quintiles 1 and 2). Incidence rose between 2002 and 2016 from 2.3 to 4.7 per 100,000 in the general population. Peak incidence occurred in females aged 25 (15.2 per 100,000). 91.6% were treated medically, 7.6% had a cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure, 0.7% underwent bariatric surgery and 0.1% had optic nerve sheath fenestration. Elective caesarean sections rates were significantly higher in IIH (16%) compared to the general population (9%), p < 0.005. Admission rates rose by 442% between 2002 and 2014, with 38% having repeated admissions in the year following diagnosis. Duration of hospital admission was 2.7 days (8.8 days for those having CSF diversion procedures). Costs rose from 9.2 pound to 50 pound million per annum over the study period with costs forecasts of 462 pound million per annum by 2030. Conclusions IIH incidence is rising (by greater than 100% over the study), highest in areas of social deprivation and mirroring obesity trends. Re-admissions rates are high and growing yearly. The escalating population and financial burden of IIH has wide reaching implications for the health care system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据