4.3 Article

Urotensin II in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease following 5/6 nephrectomy in the rat

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 421-433

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/EP087366

关键词

chronic kidney disease; subtotal nephrectomy; urotensin II

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/153224511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated serum and urine urotensin II (UII) concentrations have been reported in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar increases in UII and its receptor, UT, have been reported in animal models of CKD, but only at much earlier stages of renal dysfunction. The aim of this study was to characterize urotensin system expression as renal disease progresses to end-stage failure in a 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy (SNx) rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent SNx or sham surgery and were killed at 8 weeks postsurgery [early (E)] or immediately before end-stage renal failure [30 +/- 3 weeks postsurgery; late (L)]. Systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio and glomerulosclerosis index were all increased in SNx-E rats compared with sham-E by 8 weeks postsurgery. These changes were associated with an increase in renal immunoreactive UII staining but little change in UT expression. As CKD progressed to end-stage disease in the SNx-L group, markers of renal function deteriorated further, in association with a marked increase in immunoreactive UII and UT staining. Subchronic administration of a UT antagonist, SB-611812, at 30 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 13 weeks, in a separate group of SNx rats resulted in a 2 week delay in the increase in both systolic blood pressure and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio observed in vehicle-treated SNx but did not prevent the progression of renal dysfunction. The urotensin system is upregulated as renal function deteriorates in the rat; UT antagonism can slow but not prevent disease progression, suggesting that UII plays a role in CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据