4.0 Article

N-Acetylcysteine and Benfotiamine Protect Autotransplanted Ovarian Tissue From Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: An Experimental Study

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 251-258

出版社

BASKENT UNIV
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2017.0320

关键词

Neovascularization; Ovarian transplantation; Rat; Reactive oxygen species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effects of N-acetylcysteine and benfotiamine in protecting ovarian tissue from ischemic injury caused by slow neovascularization. The results showed that both benfotiamine and N-acetylcysteine were effective in protecting ovarian tissue against ischemic injury.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of N-acetylcysteine and benfotiamine in protection of ovarian tissue from ischemia caused by slow neovascularization injury due to intraperitoneal ovarian autotransplant in rats. Materials and Methods: Twenty- eight female rats were divided into 4 groups, each containing 7 rats. Group 1 only had the abdomen opened and closed, group 2 was the transplant-only group, group 3 received benfotiamine for 3 weeks starting 1 day before the transplant procedure, and group 4 received N-acetylcysteine for 3 weeks starting 1 day before the transplant procedure. At the end of the experimental period, malondialdehyde levels in ovarian tissues together with the apoptosis and fibrosis, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor immunoreactivity, and ovarian reserves were investigated. Results: Apoptosis was significantly increased in group 2 animals. Primordial follicle count was higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 2. Vascular endothelial growth factor immunoreactivity was decreased in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunoreactivity was reduced in the secondary follicles in all transplant groups. Conclusions: In autologous intraperitoneal ovarian transplant, both benfotiamine and N-acetylcysteine are equal and effective agents in protection of ovarian tissue against ischemic injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据