4.6 Article

Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19 yr of Follow-up

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 374-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.053

关键词

Cancer-specific mortality; Metastatic disease; Prostate cancer; PSA-based screening

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF 94-869, 98-1657, 2002-277, 2006-3518, 2010-4800]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [ZonMw-002822820, 22000106, 50-50110-98-311, 62300035]
  3. Dutch Cancer Research Foundation (SWOP)
  4. Beckman-Coulter-Hybritech Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the effect of screening in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort with men randomized in 1991-1992. A total of 1134 men were randomized on a 1: 1 basis to a screening (S) and control (C) arm after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing (PSA >= 10.0 ng/ml was excluded from randomization). Further PSA testing was offered to all men in the S-arm with 4-yr intervals starting at age 55 yr and screened up to the age of 74 yr. Overall, a PSA level of >= 3.0 ng/ml triggered biopsy. At time of analysis, 63% of men had died. Overall relative risk of metastatic (M+) disease and prostate cancer (PCa) death was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.11) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.17-1.36), respectively, in favor of screening. This ERSPC Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort, screened in a period without noteworthy contamination, shows that PSA-based screening could result in considerable reductions of M+ disease and mortality which if confirmed in larger datasets should trigger further discussion on pros/cons of PCa screening. Patient summary: In a cohort with 19 yr of follow-up, we found indications for a more substantial reduction in metastatic disease and cancer-specific mortality in favor of prostate cancer screening than previously reported. If confirmed in larger cohorts, these findings should be considered in the ongoing discussion on harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据