4.5 Article

The Risser plus grade: a new grading system to classify skeletal maturity in idiopathic scoliosis

期刊

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 559-566

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5821-8

关键词

Risser; Scoliosis; Idiopathic scoliosis; Skeletal age

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThis study aims to propose and validate a new unified Risser+ grade that combines the North American (NA) and European (EU) variants of the classic Risser score. The Risser+ grade can effectively combine the North American and European Risser Classifications for skeletal maturity with adequate intra-rater/inter-rater reliability and agreement.MethodsAgreement and reliability were evaluated for 6 raters (3-NA, 3-EU) who assessed 120 pelvic radiographs from the BrAIST trial, all female, average age 13.4 (range 10.1-16.5years). Blinded raters reviewed x-rays at two time-points. Intra- and inter-rater agreement (RA) were established with Krippendorff's alpha (k-alpha), while intra- and inter-rater reliability (RR) were established with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Acceptable agreement and reliability were set a priori at 0.80.ResultsInter-RA for the second reading met study requirements (k-alpha=0.86 [0.81-0.90]) compared to the first reading (0.72 [0.63-0.79]) while combined readings was close to target agreement (0.79 [0.74-0.84]). Removal of 20 readings demonstrating outlier tendencies increased agreement for the first, second, and combined reads (k-alpha=0.85, 0.89, 0.87, respectively). Intra-RA was sufficient for 4 out of 6 raters (k-alpha>0.80) and one rater from EU and NA presented subpar intra-RA (k-alpha=0.64 and 0.74, respectively). Inter-RR met study requirements overall reads (ICC=0.96 [0.95-0.97]) including the first (0.94 [0.92-0.95]) and second (0.97 [0.97-0.98]) reads, independently.ConclusionsThe Risser+system showed excellent reliability across multiple reads and raters and demonstrated 79% agreement overall reads and ratings. Agreement increased to over 85% when raters could distinguish Risser 0+from Risser 5. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据