4.7 Article

Glyoxal improved functionalization of starch with AZC enhances the hydrophobicity, strength and UV blocking capacities of co-crosslinked polymer

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 385-393

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.12.003

关键词

Starch; Glyoxal; Co-crosslinking; Hydrophobicity; Strength; UV blocking

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Plan Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2018129]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31770417]
  3. Graduate Student Practice Innovation Program of the Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_0837]
  4. NSERC Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective and facile approach to functionalize starch was developed using glyoxal and ammonium zirconium carbonate (AZC) as the co-crosslinking agents. The resultant starch was characterized for chemical structure, surface morphology, thermal stability, optical and hydrophobic properties and mechanical strength. H-1 and C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum confirmed the successful Schiff-base reaction on the starch. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the low glyoxal dosage had an adverse impact on the degree of crystallinity. Thermalgravimetric (TG) results revealed the weakened thermal stability at the initial decomposition process and enhanced thermal stability above the maximum degradation temperature. A smoother surface on the resultant film was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the addition of glyoxal. Significantly, enhanced mechanical and hydrophobic properties as well as ultraviolet (UV) blocking capacity of the resultant starch film were achieved at 5% (wt) glyoxal and 5% (wt) AZC content. Improved hydrophobic property and mechanical strength were also obtained even with very low dosages of glyoxal (0.5%, wt) and AZC (2.5%, wt). This new type of starch with double functionalities (i.e., hydrophobic and UV blocking capacity) provides beneficial implications for improving the performance of starch-based materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据