4.5 Article

Determinants of vitamin D status in physically active elderly in the Netherlands

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 3121-3128

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-018-1856-1

关键词

Vitamin D status; 25(OH)D; Elderly; Determinant; Physical activity; Dietary intake

资金

  1. Siemens Healthcare (The Hague, the Netherlands)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeVitamin D deficiencies are common in elderly, which increases the risk for, e.g., bone fractures. Identification of determinants of vitamin D status may provide leads for specific deficiency prevention strategies. Although determinants of vitamin D status have been studied in various populations, this has not been examined in elderly that have a physically active lifestyle.MethodsVitamin D status of 450 physically active elderly who do not use vitamin D supplements was determined and information on possible determinants (demographic, dietary intake and physical activity) was collected around a prolonged four day walking event in July and analyzed in linear regression models.ResultsThe average summertime serum 25(OH)D concentration was 88.822.4 nmol/L. Only 2% of the participants had a 25(OH)D concentration below 50 nmol/L. Dietary intake of vitamin D was 4.0 +/- 1.9 mu g/day, and the participants spent 12.4 +/- 8.6 h/week on outdoor activities. In the multivariate model, lower age (=- 0.48, 95% CI - 0.80 to - 0.16), lower BMI (=- 0.86, 95% CI - 1.62 to -0.10), being a moderate to high drinker versus a non-drinker (=7.97, 95% CI 0.43-15.51) and more outdoor physical activity (=0.25, 95% CI 0.01-0.50) were significantly associated with higher 25(OH)D concentrations.Conclusions In physically active elderly, vitamin D status was very high in summertime, with few deficiencies, suggesting that elderly with a physical active lifestyle might not necessarily need supplements during the summer period. Lower age, lower BMI, higher alcohol intake and more outdoor physical activity had a significant association with vitamin D status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据