4.7 Review

The potential role of tubeimosides in cancer prevention and treatment

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 109-121

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.11.001

关键词

Rhizoma bolbostemmatis; Tubeimosides (TBMs); Anticancer properties; Molecular mechanism

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ13C180001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31472229, 3172783]
  3. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development [2014ZX09102041-009]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFD0501505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural compounds are important sources of anticancer drugs. Rhizoma Bolbostemmatis (Chinese name Tu Bei Mu) is the dry tuber of Bolbostemma paniculatum (Maxim.) Franquet (Cucurbitaceae). It has long been widely used for treating various ailments including cancer in traditional Chinese medicine. Its major pharmacologically active components are the triterpenoid saponins tubeimosides (TBMs) including tubeimoside (TBM) I, II and III. Extensive researches have provided evidences of the anticancer activities of TBMs in different stages of carcinogenesis both in vitro and in vivo model. TBMs could inhibit cell growth and proliferation, induce cell differentiation, apoptosis, autophagy and, inhibit inflammation, and suppress angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis via various signaling pathways. They are effective in combination therapies, particularly at targeting drug-resistant cancer cells. This mini-review aims to summarize and analyze the current knowledge on the pre-clinical studies of anti-tumor effects, the underlying molecular mechanisms and discuss the prospects of the application of TBMs in cancer prevention and treatment. The potential of TBMs as pertinent candidates could be appropriately developed and designed into an efficacious anticancer drug. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据