4.1 Article

Mutated zinc finger protein of the cerebellum 1 leads to microcephaly, cortical malformation, callosal agenesis, cerebellar dysplasia, tethered cord and scoliosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 783-789

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.10.018

关键词

ZIC1; Microcephaly; Corpus callosum; Rhombencephalosynapsis; Cerebellum; Tethered cord

资金

  1. Erasmus MC Mrace project [104673]
  2. Steunfonds Marguerite-Marie Delacroix
  3. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  4. STSM from COST Action [CA16118]
  5. European Cooperation in Science and Technology [CA16118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterozygous gain of function mutations in the ZIC1 gene have been described with syndromic craniosynostosis, variable cerebral or cerebellar abnormalities and mild to moderate developmental delay. Deletion of chromosome 3q25.1 including both adjacent ZIC1 and ZIC4 genes have been described as a cause of variable cerebellar abnormalities including Dandy-Walker malformation. We report two siblings presenting with neonatal microcephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, brachycephaly with reduced volume of the posterior fossa, cerebellar and pons hypoplasia, scoliosis and tethered cord (closed neural tube defect). One of the siblings had apparent partial rhombencephalosynapsis. Trio analysis of exome sequencing data revealed a novel heterozygous frameshift mutation in ZIC1 at the end of exon 3 in one sibling and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing in both children. The mutation was not detected in DNA of both parents, which suggests parental gonadal mosaicism. We show that expression of the mutant allele leads to synthesis of a stable abnormal transcript in patient cells, without evidence for nonsense-mediated decay. Craniosynostosis was not present at birth, which explains why ZIC1 mutations were not initially considered. This severe brain malformation indicates that premature closure of sutures can be independent of the abnormal brain development in subjects with pathogenic variants in ZIC1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据