4.5 Article

The comprehensive mutational and phenotypic spectrum of TUBB8 in female infertility

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 300-307

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0283-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1001500, 2016YFC1000600]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB943300]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81725006, 81822019, 81771581, 81571501]
  4. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [17QA1400200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human oocyte maturation is a precondition for fertilization and ensuing embryonic development. Previously, we identified TUBB8 variants as a genetic determinant of human oocyte maturation arrest and showed that these variants cause variable and mixed phenotypes in oocyte maturation and early embryo development. We also estimated that rare inherited or de novo variants in the TUBB8 gene accounted for 30% of individuals in a small cohort of patients affected by oocyte maturation arrest. In the present study, we recruited a further 87 patients from unrelated families diagnosed with oocyte maturation or early embryonic arrest and identified 30 patients carrying TUBB8 variants. The corresponding phenotypes not only include oocyte maturation arrest, failure of fertilization, and early embryonic arrest, but also extend to the new phenotype of failure of embryo implantation. These observations provide the most detailed mutational and phenotypic spectrum of TUBB8, further extend the spectrum of variants and dysfunctional oocyte and embryo phenotypes caused by TUBB8 variants, and confirm previous findings for a critical role of TUBB8 during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Thus, TUBB8 mutation screening might not only be a genetic diagnostic marker for patients with oocyte maturation arrest, but might also have clinical implications for evaluating the competence of patients' functional oocytes with first polar body (PB1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据