4.2 Article

Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 383-388

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13211

关键词

Blood; double; erythrocyte; hematology; red blood cell; single; transfusion; unit

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [U54 GM104942] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Although hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion have decreased, double-unit RBC transfusion practices persist. We studied the effects switching from predominantly double-unit to single-unit RBC transfusions had on utilization and clinical outcomes for malignant hematology patients. Methods Retrospective chart review compared malignant hematology patients before and after implementing single-unit RBC transfusion policy. Hemoglobin threshold was 8.0 g/dL for both groups. RBC utilization metrics included number of RBC units transfused, RBC units transfused per admission, and number of transfusion episodes. Clinical outcomes included length of stay, 30-day mortality, and outpatient RBC transfusion 30-days post-discharge. Results Baseline hemoglobin was similar in both groups. The single-unit group was transfused with fewer RBC units per admission (5.1 vs 4.5, P = 0.01) than the double-unit group, but had more transfusion episodes per admission (4.1 vs 2.7, P < 0.001). After implementing single-unit policy, a 29% reduction in RBC utilization was observed. Mean hemoglobin at discharge was lower in the single-unit group (8.9 vs 9.5 g/dL, P = 0.005). No significant differences in length of stay or 30-day mortality were observed. Conclusion Transfusing malignant hematology patients with single RBC units is safe and efficacious. Electronic provider order systems facilitating RBC transfusion requests provide excellent adherence to transfusion policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据