4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 1160-1167

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy459

关键词

Aortic valve replacement; Long-term survival; Bioprostheses; Mechanical prostheses; Propensity score

资金

  1. Edwards Lifesciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The decision about whether to use a biological or a mechanical prosthesis for aortic valve replacement remains controversial in patients between 50and 65years of age and has yet to be addressed in a Mediterranean population. This research aimed to analyse long-term survival and major morbidity rates (30-day mortality, stroke, any prosthetic reoperation and major bleeding) within this population. METHODS Our multicentre observational retrospective study included all subjects aged 50-65years who had a primary isolated aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis at 7 public hospitals from Andalusia (Spain) between 2000 and 2015. Concomitant surgery, reoperations and endocarditis were the exclusion criteria. A total of 1443 patients were enrolled in the study (272 with biological and 1171 with mechanical valves). Multivariate analyses including a 2:1 propensity score matching (506 mechanical and 257 biological prostheses) were conducted. RESULTS Bioprostheses were implanted in 18.8% (n=272): 35% were women; the mean EuroSCORE-I was 3%. The mean follow-up was 8.14.9years in a matched sample: 8.84.9years in those receiving a mechanical vs 7.1 +/- 4.5years in those receiving a biological prosthesis (P=0.001). In the paired sample, the 15-year survival rate was 73% in those who had a biological vs 76% in those who had a mechanical valve [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.20; P=0.159]. No significant differences were observed in patients >= 55years old (74% of 15-year survival in both groups: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.34; P=0.527). A higher rate of major bleeding was found in patients with a mechanical prosthesis (P=0.004), whereas reoperation was more frequent among those with a biological prosthesis (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival was comparable in patients above 55years of age. Mechanical prostheses were associated with more major bleeding and bioprostheses, with more reoperations. A bioprosthesis in patients above 55years old is a reasonable choice. Clinical trial registration number NCT03239509.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据