4.5 Article

Relationship between VEGF-related gene polymorphisms and brain morphology in treatment-naive patients with first-episode major depressive disorder

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-018-0953-8

关键词

Major depressive disorder; Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); VEGF-related gene polymorphisms; Brain morphology; Hippocampal subfields volume; Surface-based morphometry

资金

  1. Health and Labor Research Grant in Japan [1401010101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is involved in the development of major depressive disorder (MDD). Recently, a genome-wide association study has revealed that four VEGF-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (i.e., rs4416670, rs6921438, rs6993770 and rs10738760) were independently associated with circulating VEGF levels. The current study investigated the relationship between brain volume and these four SNPs in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients. A total of 38 first-episode drug-naive MDD patients and 39 healthy subjects (HS) were recruited and underwent high-resolution T1-weighted imaging. Blood samples were collected from all the participants for serum VEGF assays and VEGF-related SNPs genotyping. Genotype-diagnosis interactions related to whole-brain cortical thickness and hippocampal subfield volumes were evaluated for the four SNPs. The results revealed a genotype-diagnosis interaction only for rs6921438 (i.e., the MDD patients and HS with the G/G genotype versus the MDD patients and HS with A-carrier genotype) in the subiculum of the left hippocampus (p < 0.05), and not the other SNPs. There was a volume reduction in the left subiculum of G/G genotype patients compared with the other groups. The hypochondriasis scores of the HAMD-17 scale were significantly higher in the G/G genotype patients than the A-carrier genotype patients. The association was observed between VEGF-related SNP rs6921438 and subiculum atrophy in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据