4.5 Article

Meta-QTL analysis and identification of candidate genes related to root traits in maize

期刊

EUPHYTICA
卷 214, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-018-2283-3

关键词

Maize; Root trait; Meta-analysis; QTL; Candidate gene

资金

  1. MOA of China [2016YFD0101201, 2016YFD0100103, 2016YFD0100303, 2014BAD01B02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [91335206]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2016QNRC001]
  4. CAAS Innovation Program
  5. MOST of China [2016YFD0101201, 2016YFD0100103, 2016YFD0100303, 2014BAD01B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maize root system architecture determines key functions of uptake of water and nutrients in plants. A large number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of root-related traits have been found in different populations of maize. Identification of consistent QTLs across diverse genetic backgrounds could be instrumental on marker-assisted selection of traits and identification of candidate functional genes. In this study, 20 published papers were investigated regarding on reported results of QTLs related to root traits of maize, and in total 428 individual QTLs for 23 root-related traits were used for meta-analysis, resulting in 53 Meta-QTLs (MQTLs) retrieved over ten maize chromosomes. Among these MQTLs regions, in total 45 maize homologs were considered as candidate genes affecting maize root traits by comparing with 7 genes from rice and 36 genes from Arabidopsis. Three maize genes (GRMZM5G813206, GRMZM2G167220 and GRMZM2G467069) identified from MQTL(8-5) could play important roles on lateral root and crown root development of maize. Two of the MQTLs, i.e. MQTL(7-2) and MQTL(9-1), involved in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) stress responses and both of them with small physical distance (less than 3Mb), could be used for abiotic stress improvement of maize root traits. These MQTLs and candidate genes will be helpful for future gene cloning and marker-assisted selection in maize.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据