4.5 Article

Seasonal Dynamics of Benthic Foraminiferal Biocoenosis in the Tropical Saquarema Lagoonal System (Brazil)

期刊

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 822-841

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-018-00514-w

关键词

Benthic foraminifera; Seasonal variation; Coastal lagoon dynamic; Saquarema lagoon; Brazil

资金

  1. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development-CNPq [Universal 445839/2014-0, Universal 445830/2014-0]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES)
  3. CNPq
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  5. CAPES [001]
  6. CNPq [301588/2016-3, 301870/2016-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates and compares the seasonal variations during winter and summer of living benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the Saquarema Lagoon System (SLS) located in a tropical coastal region of SE Brazil. The physicochemical parameters in the SLS presented strong differences between both seasons; however, they remained quite homogeneous in winter and exhibited great oscillations in summer. In the study area, 29 and 19 living foraminiferal species were identified in summer and winter, respectively. Ammonia tepida was the dominant species in both seasons followed by Ammonia parkinsoniana and Cribroelphidium excavatum. The detrended correspondence analysis showed that in the SLS: the calcareous species, such as Adelosina carinatastriata, Bulimina patagonica, and Miliolinella antartica were mostly influenced by high dissolved oxygen contents and low temperature, whereas the agglutinated foraminiferal species were indicators of the most confined lagoonal areas, under the lowest pH and salinity values. The results of this work evidence that the seasonal variation in the SLS might play a more important role in the benthic foraminiferal assemblages' distribution than the anthropogenic impacts and shows the importance of seasonal studies for coastal biomonitoring programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据