4.7 Article

PM2.5 mapping using integrated geographically temporally weighted regression (GTWR) and random sample consensus (RANSAC) models

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 1902-1910

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3763-7

关键词

GTWR; RANSAC; PM; AOD; DTB; Taiwan

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1400901]
  2. Startup Foundation for Introduction Talent of NUIST [2017r107]
  3. MOST [MOST 105-EPA-F-007-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An uncertainty in the relationship between aerosol optical depth (AOD) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) comes from the uncertainty of AOD by aerosol models and the estimated surface reflectance, a mismatch in spatiotemporal resolution, integration of AOD and PM2.5 data, and data modeling. In this study, an integrated geographically temporally weighted regression (GTWR) and RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) models, which provide fine goodness-of-fit between observed PM2.5 and AOD data, were used for mapping of PM2.5 over Taiwan for the year 2014. For this, dark target (DT) AOD observations at 3-km resolution (DT3K) only for high-quality assurance flag (QA=3) were obtained from the scientific data set (SDS) Optical_Depth_Land_And_Ocean. AOD observations were also obtained from the merged DT and DB (deep blue) product (DTB3K) which was generated using the simplified merge scheme (SMS), i.e., using an average of the DT and DB highest quality AOD retrievals or the available one. The GTWR model integrated with RANSAC can use the effective sampling and fitting to overcome the estimation problem of AOD-PM2.5 with the uncertainty and outliers of observation data. Results showed that the model dealing with spatiotemporal heterogeneity and uncertainty is a powerful tool to infer patterns of PM2.5 from a RANSAC subset samples. Moreover, spatial variability and hotspot analysis were applied after PM2.5 mapping. The hotspot and spatial variability of PM2.5 maps can give us a summary of the spatiotemporal patterns of PM2.5 variations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据