4.7 Article

Multiple lines of evidence of sediment quality in an urban Marine Protected Area (Xixova-Japui State Park, SP, Brazil)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 4605-4617

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3941-7

关键词

Environmental management; Environmental monitoring; Macrobenthic community; Marine pollution; Sediment quality triad; Toxicity identification evaluation

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [455280/2014-2]
  2. FAPESP, Sao Paulo State Research Foundation [13/15482-0]
  3. CNPq [311609/2014-7]
  4. PIBIC-CNPq [31552, 34449, 39038]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/15482-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) aim to protect habitats, biodiversity, and ecological processes as a conservation tool. These areas have been affected by contamination, which threats the biodiversity and ecological functioning. In this study, we evaluated the sediment quality of Xixova-Japui State Park (XJSP), an MPA located in an urbanized Bay (Santos, Southeast Brazil) by integrating multiple lines-of-evidence. Six sites were selected within the XJSP and analyzed for sediment chemistry, toxicity, and benthic community descriptors using Sediment Quality Triad approach (SQT). Whole-sediment Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) was employed as a complementary line of evidence to confirm the presence of domestic effluent discharges as a potential stressor. The SQT showed that sediments collected within XJSP are impacted by contaminants, exhibiting chronic toxicity and changes in benthic community. TIE results indicated that trace metals, organic contaminants, and ammonia contributed to the observed effects. Our results also indicate a lack of effectiveness of MPA in protecting the biodiversity due to the contamination sources, which requires efforts to pollution control in order to ensure the environmental conservation and management plan goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据