4.8 Article

Cropping System Diversity Effects on Nutrient Discharge, Soil Erosion, and Agronomic Performance

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 1344-1352

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02193

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [2014-67013-21712]
  2. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture [2014-XP01]
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch Project [MIN-12-083]
  4. NIFA [687436, 2014-67013-21712] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutrient, herbicide, and sediment loading from agricultural fields cause environmental and economic damage. Nutrient leaching and runoff pollution can lead to eutrophication and impaired drinking water resources, while soil erosion reduces water quality and agronomic productivity. Increased cropping system diversification has been proposed to address these problems. We used the ArcSWAT model and long-term Iowa field experimental measurements to estimate eutrophication and erosion impacts of three crop rotation systems under two weed management regimes. Rotations were comprised of 2-year corn-soybean, 3 year corn-soybean-oat/clover, and 4-year corn-soybean-oat/alfalfa-alfalfa systems. All were managed with conventional or low herbicide applications. Total N and P runoff losses were up to 39% and 30% lower, respectively, in the more diverse systems than the 2-year corn-soybean system, but NO3--N leaching losses were unaffected by cropping system. Diversification reduced erosion losses up to 60%. The 3- and 4-year systems maintained or increased crop yields and net returns relative to the 2-year conventional system. Reductions in herbicide use intensity generally did not affect nutrient and sediment losses nor crop yields and profitability. These results indicate that diversifying the corn-soybean rotation that dominates the central United States could reduce water nutrient contamination and soil erosion while maintaining farm productivity and profitability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据