4.8 Article

Novel Anaerobic Electrochemical Membrane Bioreactor with a CNTs Hollow Fiber Membrane Cathode to Mitigate Membrane Fouling and Enhance Energy Recovery

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 1014-1021

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05186

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21677026]
  2. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B13012]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT17LAB15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel anaerobic treatment system that combines the impact of applied voltage with membrane filtration over carbon nanotubes hollow fiber membranes (CNTs-HFMs) was developed at low temperature (15-20 degrees C) to mitigate membrane fouling, treat wastewater, and recover energy (CH4). Herein, electro-assisted CNTs-HFMs served a dual function as the cathode and membrane filtration. In contrast with other two anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs; polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber membranes and CNTs-HFMs without electro-assistance), the CNTs-HFMs with electro-assistance (-1.2 V applied voltage) had slower transmembrane pressure (TMP) increasing rates and better TMP recovery with a more than 95% effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate during an almost 100-day operation period. This result can be attributed to the presence of an electrostatic repulsion force pushing pollutants (mainly extracellular polymeric substances, EPS) away from the membrane surface, thereby hindering the formation of a gel layer and mitigating membrane pore blocking in the anaerobic electro-assisted membrane bioreactor (AnEMBR). Due to the almost two-times higher Methanomicrobia content and more H-2-utilizing methanogens than the other two AnMBRs, approximately more than 111.12 mL/gVSS d of CH4 was obtained in the AnEMBR with electro-assistance. This work provides an efficient strategy for mitigating membrane fouling, improving water quality, and enhancing CH4 yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据