4.8 Article

Mercury Stable Isotope Fractionation during Abiotic Dark Oxidation in the Presence of Thiols and Natural Organic Matter

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 1853-1862

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05047

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER), Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program [DE-SC0007042]
  2. DOE [DE-AC05-000R22725]
  3. [NSF-EAR-1338810]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0007042] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mercury (Hg) stable isotope fractionation has been widely used to trace Hg sources and transformations in the environment, although many important fractionation processes remain unknown. Here, we describe Hg isotope fractionation during the abiotic dark oxidation of dissolved elemental Hg(0) in the presence of thiol compounds and natural humic acid. We observe equilibrium mass dependent fractionation (MDF) with enrichment of heavier isotopes in the oxidized Hg(II) and a small negative mass-independent fractionation (MIF) owing to nuclear volume effects. The measured enrichment factors for MDF and MIF (epsilon Hg-202 and (EHg)-Hg-199) ranged from 1.10 parts per thousand to 1.56 parts per thousand and from -0.16 parts per thousand to -0.18 parts per thousand, respectively, and agreed well with theoretically predicted values for equilibrium fractionation between Hg(0) and thiol-bound Hg(II). We suggest that the observed equilibrium fractionation was likely controlled by isotope exchange between Hg(0) and Hg(II) following the production of the Hg(II)-thiol complex. However, significantly attenuated isotope fractionation was observed during the initial stage of Hg(0) oxidation by humic acid and attributed to the kinetic isotope effect (KIE). This research provides additional experimental constraints on interpreting Hg isotope signatures with important implications for the use of Hg isotope fractionation as a tracer of the Hg biogeochemical cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据