4.8 Article

Mechanisms of Interaction between Persulfate and Soil Constituents: Activation, Free Radical Formation, Conversion, and Identification

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 24, 页码 14352-14361

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04766

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207001, 2016YFD0800204]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20170050]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671478]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2014270]
  5. 135 Program of Institute of Soil Science [ISSASIP1660]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persulfate-based in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) for soil remediation has received great attention in recent years. However, the mechanisms of interaction between persulfate (PS) and soil constituents are not fully understood. In this study, PS decomposition, activation, free radical formation and conversion processes in 10 different soils were examined. The results showed that soil organic matter (SOM) was the dominant factor affecting PS decomposition in soil, but Fe/Mn-oxides were mainly responsible for PS decomposition when SOM was removed. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy analysis showed that sulfate radicals (SO4(center dot-)) and hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) generated from PS decomposition subsequently react with SOM to produce alkyl-like radicals (R-center dot), and is dependent on SOM content. R-center dot and SO4 center dot-/center dot OH radicals predominated in soil with high and low SOM, respectively, and all three radicals coexist in soil with medium SOM. Chemical probe analysis further identified the types of radicals, and R-center dot can reductively degrade hexachloroethane in high SOM soil, while SO4 center dot- and center dot OH oxidatively degrade phenol in low SOM soil. These findings provide valuable information for PS-ISCO, and new insight into the role of SOM in the remediation of contaminated soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据