4.7 Article

Mercury adsorption and re-emission inhibition from actual WFGD wastewater using sulfur-containing activated carbon

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 319-328

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.017

关键词

Mercury; Sulfurized activated carbon; Coal-fired power plant; Re-emission; Wet flue gas desulfurization

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 103-2622-E-002-038-CC3]
  2. National Taiwan University (NTU)-University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign seed fund (NTU side)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of batch experiments were conducted to obtain the optimal adsorption condition for removing aqueous Hg from actual lime-based wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) wastewater with sulfur-containing activated carbon (SAC). The experimental results showed that SAC1 had an average 0.32 mu g mg(-1) larger aqueous Hg adsorption capacity and 21% larger Hg removal than the CS2-treated SAC1 (i.e., SAC2) in all tested pH values, confirming that greater sulfur content associated with effective sulfur functional group (i.e., elemental S) caused the larger Hg adsorption capacity. Furthermore, as increasing pH from 4 to 7, the Hg adsorption capacity of SAC1 decreased by 22% (i.e., 0.27 mu g mg(-1)). The equilibrium Hg adsorption capacity was well fitted with linear and Freundlich adsorption isotherms. Kinetic simulations showed that both pseudo-second order and Elovich equations could well describe the chemisorption behavior of Hg to SAC1. Thermodynamic parameter calculation confirmed that Hg adsorption by SAC1 was thermodynamically spontaneous and exothermic. Re-emission of gaseous Hg markedly decreased by 88% as SO32- addition increased from 0 to 0.01 mM. Notably, by the addition of SAC1, zero re-emission of gaseous Hg was achieved. These experimental results confirm that the capture of aqueous Hg2+ and the inhibition of gaseous Hg-0 re-emission can be successfully and simultaneously achieved in actual WFGD wastewater via the addition of SAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据