4.7 Article

Thermodynamic investigation and experimental analysis on phenol steam reforming towards enhanced H2 production over structured Ni/ZnTiO3 nanocatalyst

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 796-810

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.099

关键词

Phenol steam reforming; Hydrogen production; Structured support; Ni/ZnTiO3; Thermodynamics analysis

资金

  1. MOE (Ministry of Education) [4F876, 17H06]
  2. UTM (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia) [4F876, 17H06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermodynamic analysis incorporated with experiments for H-2 production from phenol steam reforming (PSR) over structured Ni/ZnTiO3 nanocatalyst has been investigated. Catalyst samples, prepared via hydrothermal and impregnation methods, were characterized by XRD, FE-SEM, EDX and TGA spectroscopy techniques. First, thermodynamic analysis was applied to investigate the influence of experimental parameters on the products distribution. The optimum operating conditions of PSR based on the thermodynamic analysis were found to be; temperatures 500-700 degrees C, 5 wt% phenol concentration and atmospheric pressure, where higher H-2 yield can be obtained with minimal coke depositions. Next, catalytic performance of Ni/ZnTiO3 for promoting PSR towards H-2 production was conducted in a fixed bed reactor at 700 degrees C and 1 atm. Observably, Ni promoted ZnTiO3 catalyst found very efficient for H-2 yield and selectivity. Utilizing 10% Ni/ZnTiO3 catalyst, phenol conversion of 88.3% with H-2 yield and selectivity of 75.6 and 68.52%, respectively were attained. The stability test exhibited that Ni/ZnTiO3 catalyst kept active over 100 h without obvious deactivation. According to a comparison between thermodynamic analysis and experimental results, it was possible to illustrate deviations regarding the phenol conversion and selective H-2 production. In general, Ni/ZnTiO3 catalyst revealed excellent activity in PSR as a promising material for H-2 production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据