4.7 Article

Study on the Elemental Mercury Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanism of Iron-Based Modified Biochar Materials

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 12554-12566

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02890

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1510129]
  2. Science and Technology Major Projects of Shanxi Province [MD2015-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To provide a theoretical basis for the development of future mercury removal methods, two types of biochars modified by the coprecipitation method were investigated: undoped iron-based biochars modified with FeCl3 and iron-based biochars doped with Cu and Mn from CuSO4, Mn(CH3COO)(2), and KMnO4. The crystal phase compositions, pyrolysis characteristics, pore structures, microscopic morphologies, elemental speciations, and functional groups of the modified biochars were characterized. The adsorption mechanism was further explored by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). The results showed that the mercury adsorption of the modified biochars was significantly enhanced. The mercury adsorption performances first increased and then weakened with increased loading. The modification decreased the graphitization degree. Spinel structure solid solutions of MnFe2O4 and CuFe2O4 were formed in the modified biochars, generating many cation vacancies on the biochar surface. After biochar modification, the pore structures and the contents of carbonyl, carboxyl, and metal hydroxyl functional groups were significantly increased. The removal of Hg-0 by modified biochar is the result of a combination of adsorption and oxidation. The modification process significantly promotes the chemical adsorption of Hg-0. Functional groups, lattice oxygen, chemisorbed oxygen, halogen components, and metal oxides or ions on the sorbent surface all play roles in the oxidation of the adsorbed HG(0). Fe2O3 and CuO (MnO2 and Fe2O3) double metal oxides have a synergistic effect on the removal of Hg-0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据