4.5 Article

Development of a Physics-Based Monitoring Algorithm Detecting CO2 Ingress Accidents in a Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12010001

关键词

double redundancy monitoring; pressure monitoring; probabilistic performance analysis; sodium-CO2 chemical reaction; CO2 Brayton cycle

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP) - Korea Government Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy [20171510102040]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20171510102040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the benefits of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle in Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors is an enhanced plant safety, since potential reactions of CO2 with liquid sodium have been reported to be less stringent than a sodium-water reaction found in the Rankine cycle. However, moderate chemical interactions between CO2 and liquid sodium make detecting CO2 ingress accidents harder. Thus, this paper proposes a new physics-based detection algorithm by comparing the real-time pressure measurements of two identical heat exchangers for the early detection. The CO2 ingress occurs owing to a crack at the pressure boundary wall, a certain self-recovery of structural damage does not happen over time, and an accident probabilistically starts at only one component of two. The proposed physics-based method with the probabilistic analysis was compared to the pure data-based method. Finally, the damage degradation was developed with a simplified mass and energy transfer model, and the proposed algorithm was verified with experimental data. The results show that a 99.99% detection probability can be achieved for the air ingress of 30 cc/s, which is equivalent to the 0.12 g/s CO2 ingress, in a 70 s detection time, limiting down to 0.1% false alarms due to sensor noise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据