4.4 Article

Plurihormonal Pituitary Tumor of Pit-1 and SF-1 Lineages, with Synchronous Collision Corticotroph Tumor: a Possible Stem Cell Phenomenon

期刊

ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 74-80

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12022-018-9562-3

关键词

Pituitary tumor; SF-1; Pit-1; Stem cell; Collision; Double tumor; Plurihormonal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting pituitary tumors are the rarest functioning pituitary tumors. Nonetheless, they are not infrequently plurihormonal, as they may express/secrete hormones made by other pituitary cells derived from the Pit-1 lineage such as growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and -subunit (SU). However, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) or gonadotropin secretion by such a tumor is exceptional. Although double pituitary tumors are rare, they often combine ACTH and GH secretion. A 41-year-old presented almost 2years after delivering her 10th child; she had thyrotoxicosis (goiter and palpitations) masquerading as autoimmune postpartum thyroiditis. She was still breastfeeding and amenorrheic. She proved to have TSH, GH, PRL, and ACTH hypersecretion. Imaging revealed an invasive pituitary macrotumor. She had stigmata neither of Cushing's disease nor of acromegaly. Prior to surgery, hormonal control was achieved for close to 1year by combined octreotide and cabergoline treatment with significant shrinking of the tumor. Following surgery, pathology revealed a collision tumor; the dominant lesion was positive for GH, TSH, FSH, and SU and expressed both Pit-1 and SF-1.The smaller lesion was a corticotroph tumor. We report an unusual plurihormonal tumor co-expressing Pit-1 and SF-1 along with hormones made by cells of both lineages. Its simultaneous occurrence adjacent to a corticotroph tumor raises questions regarding the pathogenesis of these tumors. We propose the possibility of a stem cell tumor with multiple lineage differentiation. We hypothesize that pregnancy might have played a permissive role in tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据