4.8 Article

R-loop formation during S phase is restricted by PrimPol-mediated repriming

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201899793

关键词

DNA secondary structures; PrimPol; replication; repriming; R-loops

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust strategic award [101126/B/13/Z]
  2. LMB Cambridge International Scholarship
  3. UKRI Innovation Fellowship
  4. MRC [U105178808]
  5. BBSRC [BB/H019723/1, BB/M008800/1]
  6. University of Sussex PhD studentship
  7. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [107928/Z/15/Z]
  8. ERC Advanced Grant [339170]
  9. Wellcome Trust [101126/B/13/Z, 107928/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  10. BBSRC [BB/S008691/1, BB/H019723/1, BB/M008800/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. MRC [MC_EX_MR/S300001/1, MC_U105178808] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During DNA replication, conflicts with ongoing transcription are frequent and require careful management to avoid genetic instability. R-loops, three-stranded nucleic acid structures comprising a DNA:RNA hybrid and displaced single-stranded DNA, are important drivers of damage arising from such conflicts. How R-loops stall replication and the mechanisms that restrain their formation during S phase are incompletely understood. Here, we show in vivo how R-loop formation drives a short purine-rich repeat, (GAA)(10), to become a replication impediment that engages the repriming activity of the primase-polymerase PrimPol. Further, the absence of PrimPol leads to significantly increased R-loop formation around this repeat during S phase. We extend this observation by showing that PrimPol suppresses R-loop formation in genes harbouring secondary structure-forming sequences, exemplified by G quadruplex and H-DNA motifs, across the genome in both avian and human cells. Thus, R-loops promote the creation of replication blocks at susceptible structure-forming sequences, while PrimPol-dependent repriming limits the extent of unscheduled R-loop formation at these sequences, mitigating their impact on replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据