4.5 Article

Does Grazing Matter for Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in the Western North American Great Plains?

期刊

ECOSYSTEMS
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1088-1094

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-018-0324-3

关键词

cattle grazing; semiarid rangeland; shortgrass steppe; soil carbon; soil radiocarbon; soil carbon turnover

类别

资金

  1. USDA-Agricultural Research Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considerable uncertainty remains regarding grazing-induced influences on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in semiarid grassland ecosystems due to three important complications associated with studying such effects: (1) Ecologically meaningful shifts in SOC pools attributable to grazing are difficult to detect relative to inherently large grassland SOC pools, (2) a lack of baseline (pre-treatment) data, and (3) frequent lack of or limited replication of long-term grazing manipulations. SOC sequestration rates were determined in 74-year-old grazing exclosures and paired moderately grazed sites, established across a soil texture gradient, in the western North American shortgrass steppe in northeastern Colorado. We sampled soils (0-20 cm) from 12 exclosures and paired grazed sites to measure SOC concentration and soil radiocarbon increment C-14 (parts per thousand); the latter allowed us to determine turnover of the SOC pool over a 7-decade period in the presence versus the absence of grazing. Removal of grazing for more than 7 decades substantially altered plant community composition but did not affect total soil C, SOC, soil increment C-14, SOC turnover rate, or total soil N. Grazing effect also did not interact with soil texture to influence any of those soil properties. Soil texture (silt + clay content) did influence total soil C and SOC, and total soil N, but not increment C-14 or SOC turnover. Results provide evidence that long-term removal of grazing from semiarid grassland ecosystems in the western North American Great Plains does not enhance long-term SOC sequestration, despite changes in the relative dominance of C3 versus C4 grasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据