4.7 Article

Populus nigra L. as a bioindicator of atmospheric trace element pollution and potential toxic impacts on human and ecosystem

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 974-983

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.021

关键词

Poplar leaves; Trace elements; Atmospheric pollution; Man-made impact; Potential toxicity; USEtox methodology

资金

  1. Russian Scientific Fund [15-17-10011]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [15-17-10011] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in the environment like atmospheric trace element pollution can be mirrored in the elemental composition of indicator plants. They can contribute to distinguishing the degree of pollution, allocate sources of pollution, and identify their impact areas and polluting ingredients. However, ideally, the study should not be limited by these results. We should make more use of them to predict potential negative effects on the ecosystems and human health. In this research, an integrated study was implemented in Ust-Kamenogorsk city (Kazakhstan), in a territory with multicomponent, multifactor man-made impacts. Analyzing black poplar leaves we identified that Ag, As, Na, Sb, Sr, Ta, U, Zn concentrate at higher levels when compared with literature, their average contents in the dry weight of leaves are 0.08, 0.38, 936, 0.32, 193, 0.01, 0.08, 468 mg/kg respectively. We were able to show that the main source of Ag, Au, Sb, Zn is the lead-zinc plant Kazzinc, while Be, Ta, U came from the Ulba metallurgical plant. As a result, we suggested that air pollution is the main parameter influencing the change of elemental composition of poplar leaves. Applying the results in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methodology also allows us to indicate not only the degree of contamination, but also to predict the degree of toxic exposure. The highest toxic effect on humans and ecosystems is observed in the impact zone of both companies, while zinc emissions contribute most to the toxicity index (about 99%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据