4.7 Article

Gestational diabetes in young women predicts future risk of serious liver disease

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 306-310

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4775-z

关键词

Cirrhosis; Gestational diabetes; Liver disease; Liver failure; Transplantation

资金

  1. Sun Life Financial Program to Prevent Diabetes in Women
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesisIn common with type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a propensity for hepatic fat deposition. We hypothesised that GDM predicts future lifetime risk of serious liver-disease outcomes, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and need for transplantation.MethodsFrom population-based administrative databases, we identified all women in Ontario, Canada, who had a pregnancy resulting in live birth between April 1994 and March 2002 (N=698,078). This population was stratified into individuals with (n=17,932) and without (n=680,146) GDM, and both groups were further stratified according to subsequent development of type 2 diabetes in the years after delivery. The median follow-up for the development of serious liver disease (defined as hospitalisation for cirrhosis, liver failure or transplantation) was 14.0years.ResultsWomen with GDM had a higher risk of serious liver disease than those without GDM (n=680,146; HR=1.40, 95% CI 1.01, 1.94). Compared with women who did not have GDM and did not develop diabetes (n=635,998), those with GDM who subsequently developed type 2 diabetes (n=8567) had a higher risk of serious liver disease (adjusted HR=1.56, 95% CI 1.02, 2.39), as did those without GDM who developed type 2 diabetes (n=44,148; adjusted HR=2.48, 95% CI 2.10, 2.93), but not those with GDM who did not develop type 2 diabetes (n=9365; adjusted HR=1.15, 95% CI 0.69, 1.91).Conclusion/interpretationGDM is associated with future risk of serious liver disease in young women, the development of which may be dependent upon progression to non-gestational diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据