4.7 Article

MANF Is Required for the Postnatal Expansion and Maintenance of Pancreatic β-Cell Mass in Mice

期刊

DIABETES
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 66-80

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db17-1149

关键词

-

资金

  1. JDRF [17-2013-410]
  2. Commission of the European Union collaborative project MOLPARK [400752]
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Academy of Finland [117044, 141122]
  5. Biocenter Finland
  6. Helsinki Institute of Life Science infrastructure
  7. Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation
  8. Academy of Finland (AKA) [141122, 117044, 141122, 117044] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global lack of mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotropic factor (MANF) leads to progressive postnatal loss of b-cell mass and insulin-dependent diabetes in mice. Similar to Manf(-/-) mice, embryonic ablation of MANF specifically from the pancreas results in diabetes. In this study, we assessed the importance of MANF for the postnatal expansion of pancreatic beta-cell mass and for adult b-cell maintenance in mice. Detailed analysis of Pdx-1Cre(+/-) :: Manf(fl/fl) mice revealed mosaic MANF expression in postnatal pancreata and a significant correlation between the number of MANF-positive beta-cells and beta-cell mass in individual mice. In vitro, recombinant MANF induced beta-cell proliferation in islets from aged mice and protected from hyperglycemia-induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Consequently, excision of MANF from beta-cells of adult MIP-1Cre(ERT)::Manf(fl/fl) mice resulted in reduced b-cell mass and diabetes caused largely by beta-cell ER stress and apoptosis, possibly accompanied by beta-cell dedifferentiation and reduced rates of beta-cell proliferation. Thus, MANF expression in adult mouse beta-cells is needed for their maintenance in vivo. We also revealed a mechanistic link between ER stress and inflammatory signaling pathways leading to beta-cell death in the absence of MANF. Hence, MANF might be a potential target for regenerative therapy in diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据