4.1 Article

Anti-hyperuricemic effect of isorhamnetin in cultured hepatocytes and model mice: structure-activity relationships of methylquercetins as inhibitors of uric acid production

期刊

CYTOTECHNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 181-192

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-018-0275-8

关键词

Isorhamnetin; AML12 hepatocyte; Hyperuricemia; Uric acid

资金

  1. Reginal Innovation Strategy Support Program, MEXT, Japan
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K16273, JP15K07424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperuricemia is an important risk factor for gout. Isorhamnetin (3-O-methylquercetin) is an O-methylated flavonol, which occurs in onion, almond and sea buckthorn. It is also one of the metabolites of quercetin in mammals. In the present study, we investigated anti-hyperuricemic effect of isorhamnetin adopting both cultured hepatocytes and mice with hyperuricemia induced by purine bodies. In cultured hepatocytes, isorhamnetin as well as quercetin significantly and dose-dependently inhibited uric acid (UA) production. We also examined the inhibitory effects on UA production of other mono-methylquercetins, i.e., tamarixetin, 3-O-methylquercetin, azaleatin, and rhamnetin in addition to isorhamnetin for studying their structure-activity relationships. From the results obtained, hydroxyl groups at C-3, C-5, and especially C-7, but not C-3 and C-4 of quercetin are demonstrated to play a critical role in suppressing UA production in the AML12 hepatocytes. Oral administration of isorhamnetin significantly reduced plasma and hepatic UA levels in the hyperuricemic model mice. Isorhamnetin also decreased hepatic xanthine oxidase (XO) activity without changes in XO protein expression, indicating that anti-hyperuricemic effect of isorhamnetin could be, at least partly, attributable to suppression of UA production by directly inhibiting XO activity in the liver. These findings demonstrate that isorhamnetin has a potent anti-hyperuricemic effect and may be a potential candidate for prevention and remediation of hyperuricemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据