4.4 Review

Modern Computational Strategies for Designing Drugs to Curb Human Diseases: A Prospect

期刊

CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 31, 页码 2702-2719

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1568026619666190119150741

关键词

ADME/T; Drug designing; Human diseases; Pharmacophore; Lead; Ligand; Target

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug discovery is an exhaustive and time consuming process involving numerous stages like target identification, validation, lead optimization, preclinical trials, clinical trials and finally post marketing vigilance for drug safety. The application of computer aided drug designing (CADD) is an indispensable approach for developing safe and effective drugs. Previous methods based on combinatorial chemistry (CC) and high throughput screening (HTS) consumed a lot of time as well as expenditure. CADD based approaches including pharmacophore modeling (PM), molecular docking (MD), inverse docking, chemical similarity (CS), quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), virtual screening (VS) and molecular dynamics simulations have been quite productive in predicting the therapeutic outcome of candidate drugs/compounds besides saving precious time. CADD tools exploit structural and other information available regarding the target (enzyme/receptor) and the ligands to identify the compounds with ability to treat diseases notably cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, malaria, Ebola, HIV-AIDS and many more. Computational approaches have led to the discovery of many drugs that have passed preclinical and clinical trials and become novel therapeutics in the treatment of a variety of diseases. Some notable examples of CADD derived novel drugs include dorzolamide, saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, captopril and tirofiban. CADD plays important role in predicting absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/T) of candidate drugs. Overall CADD represents an effective and much needed strategy for designing therapeutically effective drugs to combat human diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据