4.2 Article

A strong structural correlation between short inverted repeat sequences and the polyadenylation signal in yeast and nucleosome exclusion by these inverted repeats

期刊

CURRENT GENETICS
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 575-590

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0907-8

关键词

Inverted repeat (IR); Yeast genome; IR map; Nucleosome exclusion; 3-Untranslated region

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26440010]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26440010] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA sequences that read the same from 5 to 3 in either strand are called inverted repeat sequences or simply IRs. They are found throughout a wide variety of genomes, from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. Despite extensive research, their in vivo functions, if any, remain unclear. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we performed genome-wide analyses for the distribution, occurrence frequency, sequence characteristics and relevance to chromatin structure, for the IRs that reportedly have a cruciform-forming potential. Here, we provide the first comprehensive map of these IRs in the S. cerevisiae genome. The statistically significant enrichment of the IRs was found in the close vicinity of the DNA positions corresponding to polyadenylation [poly(A)] sites and 30 to 60bp downstream of start codon-coding sites (referred to as start codons'). In the former, ApT- or TpA-rich IRs and A-tract- or T-tract-rich IRs are enriched, while in the latter, different IRs are enriched. Furthermore, we found a strong structural correlation between the former IRs and the poly(A) signal. In the chromatin formed on the gene end regions, the majority of the IRs causes low nucleosome occupancy. The IRs in the region 30 to 60bp downstream of start codons are located in the +1 nucleosomes. In contrast, fewer IRs are present in the adjacent region downstream of start codons. The current study suggests that the IRs play similar roles in Escherichia coli and S. cerevisiae to regulate or complete transcription at the RNA level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据