4.8 Article

Prevalence of Mutation-Prone Microhomology-Mediated End Joining in a Chordate Lacking the c-NHEJ DNA Repair Pathway

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 20, 页码 3337-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [250005, 234817]
  2. Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology Research, 2013-2022

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ), a fundamental pathway that repairs double-strand breaks in DNA, is almost universal in eukaryotes and involves multiple proteins highly conserved from yeast to human [1]. The genes encoding these proteins were not detected in the genome of Oikopleura dioica, a new model system of tunicate larvaceans known for its very compact and highly rearranged genome [2-4]. After showing their absence in the genomes of six other larvacean species, the present study examined how a dioica oocytes and embryos repair double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), using two approaches: the injection of linearized plasmids, which resulted in their rapid end joining, and a newly established CRISPR Cas9 technique. In both cases, end joining merged short microhomologous sequences surrounding the break (mainly 4 bp long), thus inducing deletions larger than for the tunicate ascidian Ciona intestinalis and human cells. A relatively high frequency of nucleotide insertions was also observed. Finally, a survey of genomic indels supports the involvement of microhomologymediated repair in natural conditions. Overall, O. dioica repairs DSBs as other organisms do when their c-NHEJ pathway is experimentally rendered deficient, using another mode of end joining with the same effect as alternative NHEJ (a-NHEJ) or microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) [5-7]. We discuss how the exceptional loss of c-NHEJ and its replacement by a more mutation-prone mechanism may have contributed to reshaping this genome and even been advantageous under pressure for genome compaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据