4.8 Article

Laminar Organization of Working Memory Signals in Human Visual Cortex

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 21, 页码 3435-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO Vidi grant) [452-13-016]
  2. EC Horizon 2020 Program [678286]
  3. Spinoza Grant [SPI 40-118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human primary visual cortex (V1) is not only activated by incoming visual information but is also engaged by top-down cognitive processes, such as visual working memory, even in the absence of visual input [1-3]. This feedback may be critical to our ability to visualize specific visual features, as higher-order regions lack the selectivity to represent such information [4]. Clearly, such internally generated signals do not trigger genuine perception of the remembered stimulus, meaning they must be organized in a manner that is different to bottom-up-driven signals. Internally generated signals may be kept separate from incoming sensory data by virtue of the laminar organization of inter-area cortical connections. Namely, bottom-up driving connections target layer 4, located in the middle of the cortical column, and feedback connections target deep and superficial layers and avoid layer 4 [5-7]. Using lamina-resolved fMRI, we simultaneously measured the activity in three early visual cortical areas (V1-V3) that are recruited to represent stimulus information during visual working memory [8]. We observed item-specific working memory signals in early visual cortex. In V1, this item-specific activity was selectively present at deep and superficial cortical depths, avoiding the middle layers, and working-memory-related activity was present at all depths in V2 and V3. These results show for the first time the laminar organization of internally generated signals during visual working memory in the human visual system and provide new insights into how bottom-up and top-down signals in visual cortex are deployed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据