4.7 Article

Rational Design of Three Two-Fold Interpenetrated Metal-Organic Frameworks: Luminescent Zn/Cd-Metal-Organic Frameworks for Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol and Nitrofurazone in the Aqueous Phase

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 7173-7182

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01335

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371154, 21371153]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in Universities of Henan Province [19IRTSTHN022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a dual-ligand strategy, three mixed ligands metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), namely, {[Zn-2(Py(2)TTz)(2)(BDC)(2)]center dot 2(DMF)center dot 0.5(H2O)}(n) (1), {[Cd-2(Py(2)TTz)(2)(BDC)(2)]center dot 2(DMF)}(n) (2), and {[Co-2(Py(2)TTz)(2)(BDC)(2)]center dot 2(DMF)center dot 0.5(H2O)}(n) (3) (where Py(2)TTz = 2,5-bis(4-pyridyl)thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole, BDC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate, and DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide), were synthesized under solvothermal conditions. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that the three MOFs possess similar 2-fold interpenetrated three-dimensional framework structures with pcu topology. The fluorescence properties of compounds 1 and 2 were investigated systematically. The results show that compounds 1 and 2 display good fluorescent properties, which can be efficiently quenched by a trace amount of nitroaromatics 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) and antibiotics nitrofurazone (NZF) in water media. The large K-sv value and small limit of detection demonstrate that compounds 1 and 2 can serve as good fluorescent sensors for TNP and NFZ detection in an aqueous system. Density functional theory calculations and spectral overlap experiments, coupled with luminescence decay experiments, confirm that the luminescence quenching mechanism involves a dynamic and static quenching mechanism and is dominated by the photoinduced electron transfer process and the Forster resonance energy transfer process simultaneously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据