4.7 Article

Durability performance and long-term prediction models of sand-coated basalt FRP bars

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 248-258

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.065

关键词

Basalt-FRP; Tensile strength; Alkaline solution; Flexural strength; Transverse shear-strength; interlaminar shear-strength; Durability

资金

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec en nature et technologie (FRQNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canada Research Chair in Advanced Composite Materials for Civil Structures
  4. service des materiaux d'infrastructures of the Ministry of Transportation of Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basalt-fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars are expected to provide benefits that are comparable or superior to other types of FRP while being significantly cost-effective. However, extensive investigations are needed to evaluate the long-term characteristics and durability performance of these bars. This article presents an experimental study that investigated the physical, mechanical, microstructural, and durability characteristics of newly developed basalt-fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars. The physical, mechanical properties and micro structural characteristics were evaluated first on the unconditioned BFRP bars. The durability performance of the BFRP bars was then assessed by conducting the mechanical tests, such as transverse-shear test, flexural test, and interlaminar-shear test, on the specimens after different exposure periods (1000; 3000; and 5000 h) at 60 degrees C. Thereafter, the BFRP bar properties were assessed and compared with the values obtained on the unconditioned specimens. The test parameter was conditioning time (1000; 3000; and 5000 h). The test results revealed that the unconditioned BFRP bars had the best physical properties. On the other hand, the long-term durability performance revealed that the transverse shear-strength, flexural-strength, and interlaminar shear-strength retention were decreased by 12%, 19%, and 21%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据