4.7 Article

A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 758-770

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024

关键词

Auxetic honeycomb; Deformation mode; Plateau stress; Impact velocity; Energy absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672013, 11672014, 11472025]
  2. Defense Industrial Technology Development Program [JCKY2016601B001, JCKY2016205C001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, auxetic honeycombs have attracted considerable attention for their excellent mechanical properties, especially the potential applications for energy absorption. In this paper, a novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb is proposed and named as re-entrant star-shaped honeycomb (RSH), with the in-plane impact responses explored theoretically and numerically. Three types of microstructural deformation modes are observed under different impact velocities, including low-velocity mode, medium-velocity mode and high-velocity mode. Moreover, a deformation map is summarized to illustrate the effects of the impact velocity and the relative density on the deformation modes. Two typical plateau stress regions are detected under low-velocity impact loading, and the second plateau stress is almost twice higher than the first one. The transverse contraction of the RSH mainly occurs at the first plateau region, which is different for the classical re-entrant honeycomb (RH). In addition, the absorbed energy of the RSH decreases slightly and then increases with the impact velocity. The results of the finite element simulations suggest that the RSH shows more excellent impact resistance, compared with the RH and SSH with same cell wall thickness. Furthermore, the effects of the cell wall thickness and the impact velocity on the crushing strength of the RSH are discussed, and the theoretical results are in good agreement with the finite element simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据